Friday, February 16, 2007

Congratulations, standing ovations, bouquets, and such are in order... take a bow, accept flowers, crack open the champagne...
This post is a break from the essay test drive mode I've followed up to now. A Heiligen Testament, theses nailed to the "cathedral" door? Or just a temporary departure, an aberration? I know less than even the unwariest reader. It is, however, a return and a new direction - to wit the change of name. I was never happy with "Mountainair Meanderings" or "Mountain Flâneuse." "flâneuse contrariante" may suit. If it doesn't, I'll just change the blog name until it does suit.

Anyway, as I said, congratulations, standing ovations, bouquets, and such are in order...

Say wha? Well, I have finally arrived as a blogger, even if the authenticating source (hereafter referred to as "they" with obligatory nod to pomo irony) swims in the local twitdom pool. Local arts council PTB are taking umbrage at blog - not Mountainair Arts one but at this one, formerly the other Mountainair blog, which said unidentified "they" claim confuses "people" (more indefinite pronoun abuse) into thinking it is the "official" arts council voice. Apparently, all art aficionados are equal but some are more equal than others...

Friday, January 19, 2007

Mountainair as Figurative Gated Community and SoCal Exurb
Urban theorist Mike Davis comments on the rise of, “gated communities of a kind, the citadel within the larger fortress,” that we see emerging across the world. In Planet of Slums, Davis contrasts and then correlates the theme park citadel to “the growth of the peripheral slums -- the middle class forsaking its traditional culture, along with the central city, to retreat into off-worlds with themed…lifestyles.” Although those closer to the actual physical city are more security conscious and indeed fortresses, others resemble re-creations of typical suburbs as immortalized in TV reruns. Still other exurbs are organized as other fantasies. 


Mountainair, already existing but inviting fantasy reorganization, beckons newcomers to “step back into yesteryear” without relinquishing today’s amenities or supply trips to Trader Joe’s. Settlers’ “expectations of authenticity” rarely connect to a clear reference point in reality. Indeed, whatever residual reality or “sense of place” a settlement destination possesses is more likely to conflict with newcomers’ fantasies than feed them. That reality and fantasy may go under the same name is irrelevant. 


The natives, their dwellings, and their institutions are not theme-park tidy, neither orderly nor manageable. They do not share their colonizers’ fantasies: nor do they imagine the present place or remember its past the same way as developers cum theme park builders attempt to represent it. No doubt generations of colonial wallahs experienced the same disconnect between themselves and the natives.


Deer Canyon is a Southwest Ranch theme park, with colorful hard-scrabble rancher accoutrements - windmills, sections of rail fence, corrals, rustic sheds - carefully retained as icons. Despite careful and remarkably authentic accessorizing, it lacks the gritty untidiness and hard life of the real thing. Only mall and food court are missing. Should some enterprising developer one day build an urban themed mall nearby, the fantasy would be complete, folding back on itself like a Borgesian mirrored labyrinth. An imagined fantasy engenders yet another fantasy, a sanitized version of the reality its consumers are in flight from.


Sources
Davis, Mike. Interview by Tom Engelhardt. “The Imperial City and the City of Slums.” in Radical Urbanism.

Thursday, April 27, 2006

Plato, Derrida, and the Mountainair Sunflower Festival - Updated

What is a festival? What is a Sunflower Festival? What is the Mountainair Sunflower Festival? Now that it has been renamed to something other than “festival,” will it still be the Sunflower Festival or will the name change turn it into something else? Why does this question or answering it even matter?

Ask people to imagine a chair: nobody will see Plato's ideal chair (the transcendental signified). Everyone will see something different, depending on context, i.e.: a kitchen table chair, an easy chair, a rattan Papa-san chair; a camp chair; a folding chair; an office chair, a Chippendale chair, a Swedish Modern chair, etc. To the extent that the transcendental signified, in this case “chair,” escapes us, the word chair is a floating signifier. Advertisers try to sell us Plato's chair by manipulating the definition. Ultimately, according to Derrida, while we are always chasing the transcendental signified, we can never get to it.

If the definition of "chair" can be difficult to pin down, abstract words are infinitely more so. Everybody’s individual, personal, and idiosyncratic understanding of abstract concepts cannot contain the idea of individually presumed components within itself. These are synthetic judgments "a posteriori,” grounded in context and individual experience.

Likewise, various interests, whether hustling the arts or more mundane transactions, manipulate (hijack) sunflower’s definition to present the event as something that will sell art, promote the town, and most especially bring visitors and their money to town. Each interest attempts to superimpose its own synthetic definition that lacks authenticity or grounding in collective local experience.

“Sunflower Festival” is not abstract in the same way as words like honor, liberty, responsibility, etc. yet lacks context to ground it, nail it down to a single agreed upon definition or description. There are so many Sunflower Festivals, all different. “Festival,” as a general category rather than a specific event, is more abstract but still refers to an event rather than a slippery concept. The Mountainair Sunflower Festival, anchored in time and space, seems sufficiently specific but floats too. “Sunflower” is specific, grounded in context, and shared experience. We all know what sunflowers are, what they look like, and when they take over the East Mountain roadsides and yards. We can even tell the difference between local varieties and the 60 kinds of sunflowers listed in the USDA database. Experience and grounding do that.

Why then does the Mountainair Sunflower Festival float? The referent, sunflower, is concrete, easily recognized, and anchored in time and space: the last weekend in August in Mountainair NM. Where then is the floater? It’s the word and event category, Festival. According to folklorists, cultural studies wonks, and chronic but discerning festival-goers, festivals are bigger, more important, more heavily scheduled than a Day or Celebration. The name implies more. It sails upstream, spawning hype. The Mountainair Sunflower Festival drifts on the ebb and flow of local volunteer energies.

Local residents, not exclusively art folk and other outsiders, enjoy the Sunflower Festival. They decorate sunflower hats, dress funky, look forward to seeing children’s sunflower in storefront windows around town, listen to live music, catch a few demos, check out art exhibits, rummage through the offerings at the library book sale and yard sales about town, and listen to readers at the Poets & Writers Picnic. They do not think of either themselves or the day as existing solely to promote art, galleries, or the town.

For example, each year I add more sunflower accessories to a sunflower shirt commissioned several years ago for festival wear and do as much of the above as I can before the heat drops me. Nor am I alone. Others turn out to wander the streets in varied and often sublimely inspired (sometimes even by sunflowers) attire. Elementary school students make Sunflower Art Projects that are displayed in storefront windows all across Mountainair’s 2-3 block “downtown.” Local artists and artisans turn out sunflower inspired work. Listeners assemble in the shade of the Shaffer Hotel garden to listen to regional and local poets and writers. It’s no coincidence that Dale Harris’ poem, “Manzano Sunflowers,” naturally emerged as a keynote for the occasion, be it festival, fiesta, day, fest, celebration, whatever. Why not just call it “Sunflower” (the day formerly known as a festival)? Let’s speak of “sunflowering,” definition to float, perhaps evolve, and see where it takes us.

Over the past eight years, the name has changed from Sunflower Arts Festival to Sunflower Festival to Sunflower Music Festival, back to Mountainair Sunflower Festival, and, most recently, to Sunflower Folk Art Festival. Only “sunflower” and, by implication, “Mountainair” remain constant. Children’s Sunflower Art, the Poet’s and Writer’s Picnic, and varying degrees of sunflower themed art remain constant as well. Even the sunflowers themselves, real flowers not signifiers, cannot be depended on. The weather may have been wrong and sunflowers peak before or after the festival. More than once, the highway department has cut the roadsides the week before, removing the event’s best natural advertisement. Visitors may take sunflower aporia and erasure as personal affronts, but locals shrug and accept this as just another “Mountainair moment.” It’s still Sunflower after all – whether or not the sunflowers show up.

Name changes add to signifier float, each a layer in the palimpsest. The fault lies less in Sunflower than in persistent efforts to name, own, and promote it as something it is not. Despite hype promising a unique experience, daytrippers may not find advertising sufficiently motivating to warrant a hot, August day trip to Mountainair. Or, if they do, they can be disappointed when the event does not live up to its hype. Residents, old-timers, long term, and transplants, however, enjoy the day: their day, their festival.

Sunflower may not fit the definition or meet requirements implied in the word, “festival.” Many support Sunflower yet agree with widely voiced concerns about appropriating the word festival to add meaning and dimension not inherent in the event – and then advertising to match an ideal, perhaps mythic Sunflower Festival, rather than promoting the reality. The practice promises more than the Festival has, in past years, delivered. Daytrippers go home and tell their friends. Next year, past and potential daytrippers tune out sunflower hype. There may as well be a ripple effect: tuning out other Mountainair events.

No doubt, Sunflower’s persisting informality owes much to its ad hoc origins. Initiated in 1999 by local resident, Adolphine Carole “just because,” Sunflower 1 celebrated the opening of Art Alley. The original event was more happening than organized event. There were no committees, no sponsoring organization, no titles, no formal schedules, no flow charts, or anything smacking of institutionalization. Everybody had a good time; it filled the gap between Jubilee and fall holidays. Everyone agreed: the Sunflower Festival should become a regular event, “improved” by organization, formal structure, and systematic promotion.

The following year, more money and promotion poured into the mix. The controlling idea was to advertise heavily and turn it into a money making music festival. It was still fun, if not either a music festival or quite the success imagined by its handlers and self-appointed promoters. After a few years, the Chamber of Commerce took over official sponsorship, this year dropping it as they had last year’s hot potato, Firecracker Jubilee.

Despite being passed from hand to hand like an unwanted child, somehow Sunflower, like its hardy sunflower namesake, survives.

Whose festival is it? Who owns it? Can any person or entity even own a festival, especially such a floater, with so many versions? The original event had a midwife but no owners. Individuals and organizations assumed, if not custody, then proprietary rights after the fact, usually without consulting festival users or contributors. Now, in the wake of an undiscussed or voted on backroom handoff by the Chamber to the Manzano Mountain Arts Council, Sunflower continues to have many absentee owners (sponsors, exploiters, followers, fans - and just those relishing an occasion to put flowers in their hair, on their hats, and elsewhere). Blissfully unaware of Derrida, floating signifiers, and possibly even Plato, maybe it’s time for the true owners to take back their festival.

Friday, April 14, 2006

Dribblings, more excuse making than update...

In keeping up and alive the more public voiced Mountainair Arts, I've been neglecting MM. Not that there aren't projects underway... notes in files and drafts started. I must remind myself that rough is the operative word for taking drafts for test drives here.

The arts thing got me thinking about a number of topics. Local & wider considerations on art/space & power. Cultural capital and applying Bourdieu to Mountainair (why stop with Habermas?). From there, I backtracked to social capital, which sheds more than a little light on overlapping groups here interact - and don't. Finally, "What is Art Anyway?," perhaps more suitable for here than its originally intended destination - on the other M blog.

Mostly unrelated to Mountainair, I've also been thinking a lot about education, - systems, corporatization, (exploited) labor, and camoflauged censorship. This last area I am probably too close and, consequently, bitter about to step back & way from rant mode. It does relate to social and cultural capital. Good therapy maybe - sloppy writing.

I also can't help thinking more these days about aging, caught up in the process as I am, with a ringside seat. Staying interested in a lot of things keeps the mental end up, except for those increasingly frequent occasions that forgettery outstrips memory and brain fog takes over. The physical end is less susceptible to mental shlock therapy jolts.

Friday, March 10, 2006

More thoughts on a town square, public space, its use, and mental mapping

The tone on this one may run too much to the academic for most tastes (mine included), but grad school habits die slowly. I'll try to infuse more juice and life into it on succeeding revisions.

I can't resist the intersection (and thus its stylistic pitfalls). After all, it's not often (what about NEVER?) my dissertation research (space in literary representation of cityscapes – from Vergil’s Troy, Rome, and Carthage to Baudleaire’s, Balzac’s, and Flaubert’s Paris, Dicken’s London, and Fuentes’ Mexico City) applies to Mountainair. The town may be a "gateway to ancient cities" (why that & not "Geronimo's raiding path"?), but that slogan is the only thing even remotely urban about it. Even the transplants gravitating here lean to the provincial (despite self-images to the contrary).

Space is space. How used and by whom shapes its nature and our perceptions of it. Urban space gets the long look because of population density - more people using it, imagining it, defining it, contesting how it should be used. Yes, small town space is qualitatively different, perhaps a liminous space between symbolically loaded spaces of city and wilderness.

Yet a number of urban design principles apply here as well. Although research and findings by urbanist William H. Whyte, architect Kevin Lynch, and the Project for Public Spaces focus on urban space, their findings also apply to a Mountainair Town Square project. Whyte's studies and work by the Project for Public Spaces offer proven techniques for measuring how people use public space, which and what kind of spaces attract users, which repel them, and which invite the most interaction among users. Armed with cameras, William H. Whyte tracked the use of small urban parks and plazas. He then mapped the specific amenities and seating available at each park and charted the patterns of use. Whyte asked:


  • Where did people sit, and what places did they avoid?
  • How were their movements affected by sun, shade, water, flowers, trees, food, and types of available seating?
  • What kinds of seating did they prefer?
  • How did use patterns change over the course of the day?
  • Did people use the space as single individuals or in groups?
  • What elements of design invite them to move into the public space?
  • What moved them to interact with others using the public space?
  • Would they move out of the path of foot traffic to conduct conversations, and if so, would they move to quieter, more out of the way spaces?
  • How did these public spaces relate to the commercial and civic buildings around them?
  • Did they have a cross-fertilizing effect, generating foot traffic and more business, which might in turn generate users of the public spaces?
  • If they were relatively unused, or used for undesirable purposes, did they cause people to stay away from the entire neighboring area?
Based on this - not to mention plain old common sense - a Town Square not only needs to be attractive and inviting but should also have scattered but ample seating - maybe even areas with tables, quiet visiting or just sitting and reading/people watching spaces, shade areas, water (so they don't leave when they get thirsty), etc.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...